Dalena Reporters l Thursday, March 6, 2026
ONITSHA — The Governor of Anambra State, Chukwuma Charles Soludo, has come under heavy criticism after the demolition of shops at the Onitsha Main Market, reportedly carried out despite a court order restraining the state government from proceeding with the exercise.
The controversy follows a ruling by the Anambra State High Court, which ordered the governor and relevant state agencies to maintain the status quo and halt any demolition pending the determination of a lawsuit filed by affected traders.
Court Order and Traders’ Legal Action
The case was brought before the court by traders and shop owners who argued that the planned demolition would cause massive financial losses and disrupt thousands of livelihoods in one of West Africa’s largest markets. The court subsequently issued an order restraining the government from demolishing structures until the matter is heard.
However, reports indicate that bulldozers moved into parts of the market and began pulling down shops, leaving traders scrambling to salvage goods and property. Security personnel reportedly barricaded access roads to the market as the demolition began.
Over 10,000 Shops Marked for Demolition
The dispute stems from the state government’s earlier decision to redevelop the Onitsha Main Market, where more than 10,000 shops were marked for demolition as part of plans to reorganize and modernize the market’s structure.
Governor Soludo had argued that many structures in the market were constructed outside the original master plan, blocking drainage channels and creating environmental and safety hazards. The government therefore described the demolition as a necessary step to restore order and improve infrastructure.
Traders React
Many traders expressed shock and frustration at the demolition, saying it happened despite ongoing legal proceedings. Some warned that destroying shops without providing alternative trading spaces would push thousands of families into economic hardship.
Market leaders and community groups have called on the state government to respect the rule of law and engage in dialogue with affected traders while the court case continues.
Wider Debate
The incident has sparked a broader debate about urban redevelopment, traders’ rights and government authority in managing public markets. Critics argue that redevelopment should be carried out with adequate consultation and compliance with court directives, while supporters of the project say the market urgently needs restructuring to improve safety and commercial efficiency.
The court is expected to continue hearing the case later in March, which may determine the legality of the demolition exercise and the future of the affected traders.